Tuesday, June 9, 2026  
 
 
 
Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
 
 
House Set to Fund Immigration Actions  06/09 09:35

   House Republicans will look to get nearly $70 billion for immigration 
enforcement over the finish line Tuesday, enough to fund a pair of Homeland 
Security agencies through the next three years and the rest of President Donald 
Trump's time in office.

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- House Republicans will look to get nearly $70 billion for 
immigration enforcement over the finish line Tuesday, enough to fund a pair of 
Homeland Security agencies through the next three years and the rest of 
President Donald Trump's time in office.

   Speaker Mike Johnson will need near perfect attendance and unity on his side 
to complete weeks of action on the bill. The legislation got sidetracked when 
Republicans sought to include $1 billion for enhanced security on the White 
House grounds, including for Trump's new ballroom, and the Trump administration 
tried to create a nearly $1.8 billion fund to compensate allies of the 
president who claim they have been unjustly investigated and prosecuted. Those 
proposals proved politically toxic and were scrapped.

   Now, the bill is focused entirely on immigration enforcement, a topic that 
Republicans have treated as a defining issue between the two major political 
parties and one they hope will carry them to victory in this year's midterm 
elections. The bill provides $38 billion for Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement, $26 billion for the Border Patrol and another $5 billion to cover 
unforeseen costs, fueling Trump's deportation agenda.

   "It's long overdue," said Johnson, R-La., of the bill. "We have to fund 
border security and immigration enforcement, and it's sad that Republicans have 
to do it on our own."

   Funding accelerates Trump's deportation agenda

   The funding comes on top of the nearly $140 billion that the 
Republican-controlled Congress gave ICE and Customs and Border Protection last 
year as part of Trump's tax and spending cuts bill.

   Democrats objected to giving the agencies more money without significant 
changes in the way they operate after the deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Good 
in Minneapolis. For example, Democrats insisted that agents be required to 
display their ID badges during enforcement operations and that they get a 
judicial warrant before entering private property. Instead, the funding will 
come with virtually no strings attached.

   House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries vowed his party would oppose the 
package.

   "We believe that taxpayer dollars should be used to make life more 
affordable for the American people -- not give ICE another $70 billion blank 
check so that they can unleash brutality on American citizens and violently 
target law-abiding immigrant communities," said Jeffries of New York.

   Homeland Security faced longest shutdown in history

   The package is the result of a monthslong standoff in Congress after 
Democrats refused to fund the Department of Homeland Security in the wake of 
the immigration enforcement actions in Minneapolis and other American cities, 
leading to the longest shutdown in agency history.

   Negotiations had been underway with the White House to alter ICE operations 
as Democrats were demanding. When those negotiations failed, Republicans turned 
to a complicated procedural maneuver to get around the filibuster and pass the 
immigration funding with no Democratic votes.

   If approved, the package would next go to Trump for his signature, all but 
assuring an essentially uninterrupted flow of funds for his immigration 
enforcement and deportation agenda into 2029.

   The Senate completed its work on the legislation last week during an 
all-night session that extended into the early morning hours Friday. The final 
52-47 vote on the bill was nearly party line, with Sen. Lisa Murkowski of 
Alaska the only Republican to oppose it.

   Money comes at pivotal time for immigration agenda

   The money will come at a pivotal time for the Department of Homeland 
Security, which is under new leadership after Trump replaced Kristi Noem with 
new Secretary Markwayne Mullin in March.

   While Mullin has vowed to keep the department out of the headlines, the 
administration is under pressure from anti-immigration advocates to deliver on 
Trump's campaign promise of the largest deportation operation in American 
history.

   So far, the administration has not hit its goal of 1 million deportations a 
year, but Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, has promised more to come, including 
hinting at immigration enforcement actions in New York, the nation's biggest 
city, which is heavily Democratic.

   At the same time, the administration is making it more difficult for legal 
immigrants to remain in the U.S. by working to end Temporary Protective Status, 
changing the processes for obtaining green cards and leaving some Dreamers -- 
the young people who were brought illegally to the U.S. as children -- 
reporting delays in renewing their status, which allows them to stay and work.

   Tight vote ahead

   On the House side, Johnson has little margin for error. Republicans can 
afford to lose only a couple of votes if every lawmaker is present. GOP 
leadership opted to avoid any hiccups and sent lawmakers home last week rather 
than take up the bill early Friday once the Senate had completed its 
all-nighter.

   The bill is just a slim package, without the hundreds of pages of details 
and directives that typically come from Congress when it provides funding for 
agencies.

   Leading up to the vote, Democrats portrayed DHS as an agency that has used 
its new resources to buy private jets for its leadership, warehouse immigrants 
in deplorable conditions and attack U.S. citizens.

   "To give these rogue agencies another $70 billion now when they still have 
$100 billion in the bank from last year would implicate all of us in the 
escalating corruption and shameful actions of this department," said Rep. Jamie 
Raskin of Maryland, the ranking Democratic member on the House Judiciary 
Committee.

   Republicans countered that they were fulfilling their duty to safeguard the 
nation and support the men and women charged with enforcing the law.

   "Democrats can say whatever they want, but what it's about is public safety. 
What's it about is keeping Americans safe," said Rep. Michelle Fischbach, 
R-Minn.

 
 
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN